Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Team Competition In Davis Cup/Fed Cup Has To Improve

                                               (image from Daviscup.com)

The first round of Davis Cup and Fed Cup play finished earlier this month and to say the least the results were rather disappointing. Many of the top players opted not to represent their countries in these team events in which players get to represent their countries. Italy for example didn't send Francesca Schiavone, Roberta Vinci,  Sara Errani, or Flavia Penitent to compete against the United States, who themselves were without Serena Williams and Sloane Stephens. Maria Sharapova opted to represent her country at the Olympics instead of the Fed Cup, etc. As for the Men things were better in the Davis Cup with Roger Federer and Stanislas Wawrinka representing Switzerland and Jo-Wilfried Tsonga, Gael Monfils, and Richard Gasquet playing for France, but still,  Rafael Nadal didn't compete for Spain and Novak Djokovic didn't compete for Serbia along with fellow countryman Janko Tipsarevic.

The lack of players truly caring about Fed Cup and Davis Cup has been an ongoing problem for tennis, and it isn't entirely the players' fault. With all the matches that these guys have to play, the weeks of Davis Cup and Fed Cup can seem like a rare chance to rest up for a week and relax a bit. Going out to play in a tournament that doesn't count for much towards your own ATP or WTA ranking points and is considered optimal can be hard to get up for. But still, even with that, one would like to think that these players would love to get the chance to represent their countries and show a little patriotism. I don't know what exact changes would help increase Davis Cup and Fed Cup participation, but changes do need to be made.

One guy I know, named Phil Naessens,  suggested on his show with me as his guest that the Davis Cup and Fed Cup become compressed into a one or two week event. This suggestion is interesting since the fact that it gets spaced out over the calendar year all the way until December does seem to take steam out of the Davis Cup. Perhaps turning these events into a 5th Grand Slam of sorts would make players become more eager to compete.

In addition to this idea, I think making Davis Cup and Fed Cup play mandatory needs to somehow happen. Mandatory is a bit strong, but at the very least, the ITF could make the consequences of not playing severe enough that players would think twice about not playing in it. Maybe really up the ranking points for it, or give special consideration to players in seeding at Grand Slams based on Davis Cup or Fed Cup participation. Technically speaking, the ITF doesn't have to seed players based on ATP and WTA ranking points. If they wanted to make Davis Cup and Fed Cup participation a heavy part of their seeding selection process they could do it, and they could make players pay for not participating. E.g. Andy Murray could get a top seed at the French Open because he participated in Davis Cup and Nadal did not. Of course, it couldn't be that simple, but maybe him participating ups his seeding by one or two spots. That would make players think twice about choosing to skip Davis Cup and Fed Cup for sure.

In conclusion, the main take away from this is that the Status quo for Fed Cup and Davis Cup is not acceptable. These events need to have the stars of tennis participating. Otherwise it turns into a joke. The entire Russian Fed Cup team consisted of players' names who I hadn't heard of, which says a lot since I'm familiar with at least 300-400 names in tennis since I spend so much time updating people from every tournament on the ATP and WTA tours. Russia's lack of Fed Cup participation was embarrassing, but it was just one instance of an ongoing problem in tennis that needs to change. I hope for the sake of tennis and the spirit of international team competition, changes are made to make Fed Cup and Davis Cup play more appealing and rewarding to those who choose to compete.

---Ben Parker: follow me on twitter @atp_guy  

Sunday, February 2, 2014

How Will Stanislas Wawrinka's Australian Open Title Affect The 2014 ATP Season?


When people listed their potential dark horses to win the Australian Open on the men's side, Stanislas Wawrinka's name came up as a result of his incredible performance at the 2013 Australian Open against Novak Djokovic. But nobody actually thought that Wawrinka would win it all. To those of us who follow the ATP World Tour year round, we can't say we were shocked by this result given Stan's great season in 2013, but we also can't say we saw it coming either. It feels weird to see somebody not named Rafael Nadal, Novak Djokovic, Roger Federer, or Andy Murray walk away with the title at the end of a grand slam. Given how dominant those four players have been over the past several seasons, the odds that somebody wins a grand slam outside of those four seems almost impossible, which is why many tennis fans including myself still feel like we are in a dream every time we see the words "Stanislas Wawrinka Grand Slam Champion" in a cohesive sentence.

But with Wawrinka actually being the 2014 Australian Open champion, the landscape of the 2014 ATP World Tour season and how it ultimately shakes out has suddenly become a lot more cloudy than clear. Wawrinka has now leapfrogged both Roger Federer and Andy Murray in the rankings as a result of his grand slam title, shooting up to #3 in the world, only behind Rafael Nadal who is #1 and Novak Djokovic who is #2. But while many different possible scenarios could ultimately play out (with Wawrinka even finishing the year #1 should he win another grand slam title), one thing that definitely seems to be true is that his title most greatly affects Novak Djokovic's season, really putting Djokovic behind the 8-ball.

If you read my preview for the Australian Open, you would know that I said that Djokovic had to win this Australian Open in order to bounce back and re-establish himself. I stand by that, and what's worse is that he wasn't beaten by Nadal, he was beaten by Wawrinka. This isn't to take anything away from Wawrinka, rather it is to highlight the fact that Djokovic has more than just Nadal and Murray to worry about at this stage of his career. He also has Wawrinka, and possibly others as well. Failing to win the Australian Open is potentially lethal to Djokovic's season because this was the one grand slam event where he was the clear favorite. The rest of the grand slams he isn't necessarily the favorite. Rafael Nadal is the clear favorite to win the French, Wimbledon seems to be pretty evenly split between  Murray, Nadal, Djokovic, and Federer with Murray having the slight edge, and the US Open is pretty evenly split except now we probably say that Wawrinka is in that mix to win it and not Federer. The point is, with the rest of the grand slams not being in his favor to win, it'll be very hard for Djokovic to win a grand slam, which means his odds of not winning a grand slam in 2014 are very high.

Failing to win a grand slam in 2014 would be devastating for Djokovic as he tries to establish himself as an all-time great. I think we already know that he is one of the greatest players to ever play, but history judges players by their total grand slam titles, and not on just one or two amazing seasons. The bottom line is that the victory of Stanislas Wawrinka at the Australian Open really puts Novak Djokovic into a tough situation since his odds of not winning a grand slam are suddenly quite high. It'll be interesting to see how Djokovic responds as the season goes on not only in the grand slams, but also in the future masters events such as Indian Wells, Miami, Monte Carlo, and Madrid since those events will give us a good indicator of where his head is going into the remaining three grand slams.

---Ben Parker: follow me on twitter @atp_guy